Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents could invoke Section 57 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 to recover dues from immovable property claimed not to form part of the deceased dealer's estate; and whether a notice of demand under Section 42 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule 61 was a prerequisite for auction proceedings under Section 152 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code.
Analysis: The Court recorded a prima facie view that the material then placed did not indicate that the property in question formed part of the deceased dealer's estate or that the deceased was a joint owner or co-owner. It also noted the contention that invocation of the recovery machinery required prior notice of demand under Section 42 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule 61. Time was granted to the respondents to address these points, and the matter was posted for final hearing.
Outcome: No final adjudication was made on the merits. Status quo was directed to be maintained regarding the nature, character, and possession of the property until the next date of hearing.