Vendors must pay GST: High Court ruling upholds tax recovery by Neyveli Lignite Corp.

The Madras High Court, in a judgment by Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth, upheld Neyveli Lignite Corporation's communication requiring vendors to recover unpaid tax amounts. The court emphasized vendors' liability for GST payment and the consequences of not remitting deducted taxes. It ruled that vendors must fulfill their tax obligations without court intervention, dismissing the writ petition and related Miscellaneous Petitions without costs.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Challenge to communication by Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) regarding recovery of tax from vendors who did not deposit it.

Analysis:
The judgment by Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth of the Madras High Court dealt with a challenge to a communication dated 06.02.2021 issued by Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC). The communication called upon the NLC's vendors, who are members of the petitioner association, to recover tax amounts that were collected but not deposited. The consideration paid by the petitioners to NLC included GST, and the liability for GST payment rested with the members of the petitioner association. It was acknowledged that GST deductions were not fully or partly remitted in many cases. Consequently, NLC faced a reversal of Input Tax Credit and had to remit the demand raised. The court observed that the impugned communication aimed to enforce the contractual obligations between NLC and its vendors, emphasizing the vendors' liability to remit the tax deducted to the tax department.

The judgment highlighted that the vendors' failure to remit the deducted tax would make them liable for interest and penal action. The court noted that the vendors could seek NLC's indulgence for additional time to remit the tax, whether not remitted or short deducted. However, the court concluded that this matter did not require the court's intervention, as the liability of deductors to remit the tax to the tax department was absolute. The judgment dismissed the writ petition, stating that apart from the mentioned observation, no further issues remained for consideration. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions were also dismissed, and no costs were awarded in the case.

---