<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 336 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405008</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court, in a judgment by Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth, upheld Neyveli Lignite Corporation&#039;s communication requiring vendors to recover unpaid tax amounts. The court emphasized vendors&#039; liability for GST payment and the consequences of not remitting deducted taxes. It ruled that vendors must fulfill their tax obligations without court intervention, dismissing the writ petition and related Miscellaneous Petitions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 336 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405008</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court, in a judgment by Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth, upheld Neyveli Lignite Corporation&#039;s communication requiring vendors to recover unpaid tax amounts. The court emphasized vendors&#039; liability for GST payment and the consequences of not remitting deducted taxes. It ruled that vendors must fulfill their tax obligations without court intervention, dismissing the writ petition and related Miscellaneous Petitions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>