Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2021 (3) TMI 178 - HC - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court sets aside balance interest amount, upholds penalties, and directs payment within 30 days The Court partly allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the order for the petitioners to pay the balance interest amount. Penalties and redemption fine ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court sets aside balance interest amount, upholds penalties, and directs payment within 30 days

                            The Court partly allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the order for the petitioners to pay the balance interest amount. Penalties and redemption fine imposed by the Settlement Commission were upheld, with the petitioners directed to pay the remaining amounts within 30 days. The Court held that the invocation of certain rules for interest recovery was without jurisdiction due to the timing of amendments.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Levy of interest and imposition of penalties by the Settlement Commission.
                            2. Jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the writ petitions on the ground of "forum non conveniens".
                            3. Applicability of Rule 3(5) and Rule 3(5A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
                            4. Validity of amendments to the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and their retrospective application.
                            5. Imposition of penalty and redemption fine as a condition for granting immunity from prosecution.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Levy of Interest and Imposition of Penalties by the Settlement Commission:
                            The petitioners challenged the Settlement Commission's order dated 15.04.2014, which directed them to pay interest on a balance amount of Rs. 22,44,953/- and imposed penalties under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Settlement Commission had settled the additional amount of Central Excise Duty at Rs. 1,23,56,697/- and interest at Rs. 30,51,968/-. The petitioners had already paid Rs. 8,07,015/- towards interest, and the balance interest amount was to be paid within 30 days. Additionally, penalties of Rs. 1,25,000/- on the petitioner and Rs. 25,000/- on the Managing Director were imposed under the relevant provisions.

                            2. Jurisdiction of the Court to Entertain the Writ Petitions on the Ground of "Forum Non Conveniens":
                            The second respondent argued that the writ petitions should be dismissed on the ground of "forum non conveniens," as both the petitioner company and the second respondent are from Andhra Pradesh. The Court noted that the doctrine of "forum conveniens" should be invoked at the threshold and not at the final hearing stage. Since the objection was raised after six years and no counter was filed earlier, the Court decided to entertain the writ petitions.

                            3. Applicability of Rule 3(5) and Rule 3(5A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004:
                            The Court examined Rule 3(5) and Rule 3(5A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Rule 3(5) required payment of an amount equal to the credit availed if capital goods were removed "as such." However, Rule 3(5A), which was introduced on 01.04.2012, required payment of an amount equal to the CENVAT credit taken on capital goods when removed after use. The removals by the petitioner occurred between 22.11.2011 and 14.03.2012, before the introduction of Rule 3(5A).

                            4. Validity of Amendments to the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and Their Retrospective Application:
                            The Court noted that the amendments to Rule 3(5A) and the introduction of the Explanation for recovery under Rule 14 were effective from 01.03.2013 and 08.01.2014, respectively. Since the removals occurred before these amendments, the Court held that the invocation of Rule 14 for interest recovery was without jurisdiction.

                            5. Imposition of Penalty and Redemption Fine as a Condition for Granting Immunity from Prosecution:
                            The Court upheld the imposition of penalties and redemption fine on the petitioners as a condition for granting immunity from prosecution under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The amount of Rs. 8,07,015/- already paid by the petitioner towards interest was treated as an additional amount for settling the case. The Court directed the petitioners to remit the balance amount of penalty and redemption fine within 30 days if not already paid.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Court partly allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the order directing the petitioners to pay the balance interest amount of Rs. 22,44,953/-. The penalties and redemption fine imposed by the Settlement Commission were upheld, and the petitioners were directed to pay the remaining amounts within 30 days.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found