Tribunal Admits Insolvency Application: Corporate Debtor's Payment Dispute Unsubstantiated, Moratorium Imposed.

The Tribunal admitted the application under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, filed by the Applicant against the Corporate Debtor for unpaid dues of Rs. 29,85,157.31. The Corporate Debtor's dispute over the payment was deemed unsubstantiated. Consequently, an Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and a moratorium was imposed under Section 14(1) of the Code. The Applicant was instructed to deposit Rs. 2 lakhs with the IRP for expenses. The order was communicated to relevant parties and authorities for compliance.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiating Corporate Insolvency process against a Corporate Debtor.
2. Dispute regarding outstanding payment between the Applicant and the Corporate Debtor.
3. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional and imposition of moratorium.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Application under Section 9 of IBC, 2016
The Applicant, a company involved in the supply of construction materials, filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency process against the Corporate Debtor, who had outstanding dues amounting to &8377; 29,85,157.31. The Corporate Debtor had failed to clear the liability despite admission of the debt and receipt of multiple reminders and notices. The Tribunal found the application to be in compliance with the necessary provisions and admitted it for further proceedings.

Issue 2: Dispute over outstanding payment
The Corporate Debtor had raised a dispute regarding the outstanding amount, claiming that certain payments had been made from their sister concern and contending that interest was not payable as per the invoices raised by the Applicant. However, the Tribunal noted that the Corporate Debtor's contentions were not substantiated, and the Applicant had provided evidence to refute the claims made by the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal held that the default in payment had occurred, and the dispute raised by the Corporate Debtor was deemed to be unsubstantiated, citing the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of "Mobilox Innovations Private Limited Vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited."

Issue 3: Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional and moratorium
In light of the admitted default by the Corporate Debtor and the application being deemed valid, the Tribunal appointed an Interim Resolution Professional to oversee the insolvency proceedings. A moratorium was imposed on the Corporate Debtor as per Section 14(1) of the Code, prohibiting certain actions against the Corporate Debtor during this period. The Applicant was directed to deposit a sum of &8377; 2 lakhs with the Interim Resolution Professional to cover expenses, and further instructions were provided regarding the communication of the order to the parties involved, the IRP, IBBI, and ROC for compliance.

This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues addressed in the judgment, detailing the legal proceedings and outcomes related to the application filed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

---