Section 138 notice refusal and 15-day cause of action rule made the complaint premature and unsustainable.

Refusal of the demand notice was held to have occurred on 10.04.2007, as the envelope carried that endorsement and there was no evidence supporting an earlier refusal date. On that basis, a complaint filed on 17.04.2007 was premature because Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires expiry of 15 days from receipt or refusal of notice before the cause of action arises. The courts below could not sustain the contrary view, and the conviction and sentence were set aside, with liberty to the complainant to pursue fresh remedies in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the date of refusal of the demand notice was 02.04.2007 or 10.04.2007. (ii) Whether the complaint filed on 17.04.2007 was premature and not maintainable for want of accrual of cause of action under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Issue (i): Whether the date of refusal of the demand notice was 02.04.2007 or 10.04.2007.

Analysis: The envelope bore a specific endorsement of refusal dated 10.04.2007. There was no oral or documentary evidence showing that the accused had refused service on 02.04.2007, 03.04.2007 or 09.04.2007. The postal peon was not examined. The finding that refusal occurred on 02.04.2007 was therefore unsupported by evidence and could not stand. The endorsement dated 10.04.2007 was accepted as the date of refusal.

Conclusion: The date of refusal was 10.04.2007 and not 02.04.2007.

Issue (ii): Whether the complaint filed on 17.04.2007 was premature and not maintainable for want of accrual of cause of action under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Analysis: The statutory scheme requires expiry of 15 days from receipt of notice before cause of action arises. A complaint filed before expiry of that period does not disclose a complete cause of action and cannot be treated as maintainable merely because cognizance is taken later. Applying that rule, the complaint filed on 17.04.2007 was presented before expiry of 15 days from 10.04.2007. The contrary view taken by the courts below could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The complaint was premature and not legally maintainable.

Final Conclusion: The conviction and sentence were set aside, and the petitioner stood acquitted, with liberty to the complainant to pursue fresh remedies in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, no complaint lies before expiry of 15 days from service or refusal of the demand notice, because the cause of action arises only after that statutory period has elapsed.

---