Supreme Court rules against assessee in appeal; remand order not a legal question. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. The court held that the order of remand was not ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court rules against assessee in appeal; remand order not a legal question.
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. The court held that the order of remand was not considered a question of law, based on the precedent set in Phool Chand Bajrang Lal v. ITO [1993] 203 ITR 456. No costs were awarded in this case.
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal based on the decision in Phool Chand Bajrang Lal v. ITO [1993] 203 ITR 456. Question No.1 was answered against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. Question No. 2, being an order of remand, was not considered a question of law. No costs were awarded.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.