Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suit for mandatory injunction was maintainable when the plaintiffs had relinquished their right in the imported goods and had not pursued the remedy under the Customs Act.
Analysis: The plaintiffs had themselves given up their claim over the goods after the enhancement of customs duty. The dispute arose from an order of the customs authorities, against which the Customs Act, 1962 provided a specific appellate remedy under Section 128. The plaintiffs failed to show that they had exhausted that statutory remedy. The challenge to the administrative decision was also not pursued in the suit. In these circumstances, the civil suit could not be used to bypass the special procedure under the Customs Act, and the claim for mandatory injunction was not available.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the plaintiffs and in favour of the Revenue. The civil suit was not maintainable and the plaintiffs were not entitled to the mandatory injunction.