<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 689 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400934</link>
    <description>A civil suit for mandatory injunction was held unavailable where the plaintiffs had relinquished their claim to imported goods after the customs duty enhancement and had not pursued the statutory appeal under the Customs Act, 1962. The court treated the customs authority&#039;s order as one governed by the special appellate remedy in Section 128 and noted that the plaintiffs neither showed exhaustion of that remedy nor continued to challenge the administrative decision in the suit. In these circumstances, the civil court could not be used to bypass the Customs Act procedure, and the injunction claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 689 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400934</link>
      <description>A civil suit for mandatory injunction was held unavailable where the plaintiffs had relinquished their claim to imported goods after the customs duty enhancement and had not pursued the statutory appeal under the Customs Act, 1962. The court treated the customs authority&#039;s order as one governed by the special appellate remedy in Section 128 and noted that the plaintiffs neither showed exhaustion of that remedy nor continued to challenge the administrative decision in the suit. In these circumstances, the civil court could not be used to bypass the Customs Act procedure, and the injunction claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>