Customs Broker License Suspension Overturned: Immediate Necessity Not Shown

The Tribunal set aside the suspension of the Customs Broker (CB) license due to the lack of immediate necessity demonstrated by the Commissioner of Customs. The violations alleged against the CB did not warrant immediate action, as emphasized by the Tribunal. The inquiry proceedings under Regulation 17 were allowed to continue, with directions to the Commissioner to permit the operation of the CB license immediately. The appeal was partially allowed to balance justice and convenience.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Suspension of Customs Broker (CB) Licence.
2. Violation of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018.
3. Legality and necessity of immediate suspension.
4. Inquiry proceedings under Regulation 17 of CBLR, 2018.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Suspension of Customs Broker (CB) Licence:
The appellant's CB licence was suspended by the Commissioner of Customs (Airport & Administration), Customs House, Kolkata, under Regulation 16(2) of CBLR, 2018. The suspension was based on an investigation report by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) concerning an export consignment of M/s. Skivvies Textile. The DRI found that the CB had failed to fulfill obligations under Regulations 10(b), 10(d), 10(e), and 10(n) of CBLR, 2018. The Tribunal noted that the suspension order did not demonstrate the "immediate necessity" required under Regulation 16, thus failing to justify the suspension.

2. Violation of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018:
The CB was alleged to have violated Regulation 10(B) by not getting Shri Babul Dey approved by the Deputy Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner of Customs. The CB was also accused of not verifying the correctness of the export consignment and not collecting the authorization and KYC from the exporter directly, thus violating multiple provisions of Regulation 10. However, the Tribunal pointed out that the suspension was not warranted as the alleged violations did not necessitate immediate action.

3. Legality and Necessity of Immediate Suspension:
The Tribunal emphasized that the power of suspension under Regulation 16 should be exercised only in appropriate cases where immediate action is necessary. The Tribunal cited several judgments, including Rubee Air Freight Ltd. v/s CC (Airport & Administration), Kolkata, and N.C. Singha & Sons v/s. UOI, to underline that suspension should not be exercised routinely or mechanically. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner failed to provide reasons for the immediate necessity of suspension, thus rendering the suspension order unsustainable.

4. Inquiry Proceedings under Regulation 17 of CBLR, 2018:
The inquiry proceedings initiated under Regulation 17 were based on the impugned Order-in-Original dated 6.3.19. The Inquiry Report dated 19.7.19 was set aside by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta due to non-provision of relied-upon documents to the CB. The Tribunal noted that the authorities failed to complete the inquiry within the stipulated time and that a fresh inquiry was yet to be concluded. The Tribunal directed that the inquiry should continue but without the suspension of the CB licence, as the continued suspension had irreversible civil consequences on the appellant.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal modified the impugned Order-in-Original by setting aside the suspension of the CB licence while allowing the inquiry proceedings under Regulation 17 to continue. The Commissioner of Customs (Airport & Administration), Kolkata, was directed to issue an order allowing the operation of the CB licence immediately. The appeal was allowed partly, balancing justice and convenience.

---