Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2026 (3) TMI 602 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Suspension of customs broker licence upheld where prima facie evidence of contraventions and narcotics risk justified emergent action. The note addresses suspension of a customs broker licence under Regulation 16(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, finding that ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Suspension of customs broker licence upheld where prima facie evidence of contraventions and narcotics risk justified emergent action.

                            The note addresses suspension of a customs broker licence under Regulation 16(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, finding that available prima facie material-including a vigilance/investigation report, container-scan mismatch, failure to perform instructed 100% examination, unreliable third party documentation, and an importer profile inconsistent with the goods-sufficiently indicated breaches of Regulation 10(d), 10(e), 10(f) and 10(n) and risks of large scale narcotic smuggling; accordingly emergent suspension was permissible pending inquiry. The suspension was also held not vitiated by delay, and the inquiry must proceed within regulatory timelines.




                            Issues: (i) Whether suspension of the customs broker's licence under Regulation 16(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 was justified on the basis of alleged contraventions of Regulation 10(d), 10(e), 10(f) and 10(n) of CBLR, 2018 and available prima facie material; (ii) Whether the suspension order was vitiated by delay or absence of immediate necessity.

                            Issue (i): Whether suspension under Regulation 16(1) CBLR, 2018 was justified on the available prima facie material and alleged breaches of Regulation 10(d), 10(e), 10(f) and 10(n) of CBLR, 2018.

                            Analysis: The material before the Tribunal included a vigilance/investigation report forwarded by the investigating agency, record of container scanning showing a scanned mismatch and marking for 100% examination under Public Notice No. 01/2018-19 dated 20.04.2018, and examination records indicating only one bag was opened despite instruction for 100% examination. The documents provided to the broker by a third party did not reliably establish that the third party was authorised, and the importer's trade profile was materially different from the imported goods, which should have prompted heightened verification. The investigation indicated large-scale smuggling involving narcotic drugs, raising national security and public interest concerns. The Tribunal found these prima facie factual and procedural lapses relevant to the obligations imposed by Regulation 10(d), 10(e), 10(f) and 10(n) and sufficient to invoke emergent suspension power under Regulation 16(1) pending completion of inquiry.

                            Conclusion: Suspension under Regulation 16(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 was justified on the available prima facie material and alleged contraventions of Regulation 10(d), 10(e), 10(f) and 10(n) of CBLR, 2018; the impugned suspension is upheld.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the suspension order was vitiated by delay or absence of immediate necessity.

                            Analysis: The investigative process was conducted by a national investigative agency and the vigilance report was forwarded to the customs authority before suspension was imposed. The suspension was imposed after receipt of the investigation/vigilance report and confirmed subsequently. Given the nature of the alleged offences involving narcotic smuggling and the timeline of receipt of investigative material, the Tribunal found no undue delay or lack of immediate necessity for suspension; precedents addressing delayed suspensions were distinguished on facts.

                            Conclusion: The suspension order was not vitiated by delay or absence of immediate necessity; the ground of delay is dismissed.

                            Final Conclusion: The Tribunal dismisses the appeal and upholds the suspension of the customs broker's licence under Regulation 16(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, while directing that the inquiry proceed in accordance with the timelines prescribed by the Regulations.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Where prima facie evidence indicates serious contraventions by a customs broker implicating national security or large-scale contraband, and an investigation/vigilance report supports such prima facie findings, suspension under Regulation 16(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 is a permissible emergent measure pending completion of inquiry.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found