Reasoned orders in writ petitions are mandatory; a non-speaking dismissal breaches natural justice and blocks meaningful appellate review.

Recording reasons is a cardinal requirement when a court or authority determines rights and liabilities in writ proceedings, because a reasoned order informs the parties why relief was refused and permits appellate review of the facts and law considered. The requirement forms part of fair administration of justice and natural justice. A writ petition should therefore not be dismissed by a laconic non-speaking order; the court must pass a speaking order stating relevant reasons.

---

---

Issues: Whether a writ petition can be dismissed by a non-speaking order without recording reasons.

Analysis: Recording reasons is a cardinal requirement when a court or authority decides rights and liabilities, particularly in writ proceedings. A reasoned order enables the parties to know why relief was refused and allows appellate review to test whether the relevant facts and law were properly considered. The requirement is part of fair administration of justice and the principles of natural justice, and it applies with equal force to orders passed on writ petitions.

Conclusion: A writ petition should not be dismissed by a laconic non-speaking order; the Court must pass a speaking order stating the relevant reasons.

---