TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court sets aside Tribunal decision on reassessment, emphasizes thorough examination of unexplained cash credits.</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income Tax, The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Shri HE Panduranga</h3> The Commissioner of Income Tax, The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Shri HE Panduranga - [2021] 430 ITR 70 (Kar) Issues:1. Tribunal annulling reassessment under Section 147 for assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98 without going into merits.2. Application of provisions of sub-Section 2 to Explanation(c) of section 158BA by the Tribunal.Analysis:Issue 1:The appeal involved a challenge by the revenue regarding the Tribunal annulling the reassessment made protectively under Section 147 for the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98 without delving into the merits of the case. The assessee, a proprietor of a firm, faced a search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act in 2000, leading to the discovery of undisclosed income. The Assessing officer determined the total undisclosed income, including unexplained credits for the relevant assessment years. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) subsequently deleted these additions, stating that the credits were disclosed earlier and could not be assessed in block assessment. The Tribunal remitted the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for fresh consideration. However, the Tribunal, without deciding on the merits, held that the reassessment orders had become infructuous. The High Court found that the Tribunal erred in not adjudicating on the issue of unexplained credits, remitting the matter back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a fresh determination.Issue 2:The second substantial question of law involved the application of provisions of sub-Section 2 to Explanation(c) of section 158BA by the Tribunal. The revenue contended that the Tribunal incorrectly applied these provisions and failed to consider the decision of the Supreme Court in a specific case. The High Court, however, did not delve into this issue as it found the need to remit the matter back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a fresh determination on the unexplained cash credits. The High Court quashed the Tribunal's order and directed a reevaluation of the issue of unexplained cash credits amounting to specific sums for the relevant assessment years.In conclusion, the High Court's judgment set aside the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the necessity to address the issue of unexplained cash credits in a more detailed manner. The matter was remitted to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a fresh determination, highlighting the importance of adjudicating on the merits of the case thoroughly.
TaxTMI 