<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 495 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398376</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision annulling reassessment under Section 147 for the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98 without addressing the merits. The Court emphasized the need to thoroughly examine the issue of unexplained cash credits and remitted the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a fresh determination. The Court also highlighted the importance of adjudicating on the merits of the case in detail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 495 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398376</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision annulling reassessment under Section 147 for the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98 without addressing the merits. The Court emphasized the need to thoroughly examine the issue of unexplained cash credits and remitted the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a fresh determination. The Court also highlighted the importance of adjudicating on the merits of the case in detail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>