CBDT monetary-limit exception does not cover Investigation Wing information; low-tax-effect revenue appeal was not maintainable.

CBDT monetary-limit circulars bar departmental appeals where the tax effect is below the prescribed threshold. The exception for additions based on information from external law enforcement agencies applies only to agencies such as CBI, ED, DRI, SFIO or DGGI, and not to information received merely from the Department's Investigation Wing. On that basis, the revenue appeal was held not maintainable and could not be entertained under the monetary-limit regime.

---

---

Issues: Whether the revenue appeal was maintainable in view of the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circulars, and whether the exception for additions based on information from external sources in the nature of law enforcement agencies applied to information received from the Investigation Wing.

Analysis: The appeal involved a low tax effect. The disputed addition was made on the basis of information received from the Investigation Wing of the Department. The applicable circulars carved out an exception only where the addition was based on information from external sources in the nature of law enforcement agencies such as CBI, ED, DRI, SFIO or DGGI. Information from the Investigation Wing was held not to fall within that exception. The later circular relied upon also did not assist the revenue on the facts of the case.

Conclusion: The revenue appeal was not maintainable as the tax effect did not exceed the prescribed monetary limit and the exception clause did not apply.

Final Conclusion: The appeal could not be entertained on account of the monetary limit regime governing departmental appeals.

Ratio Decidendi: Information received from the Department's Investigation Wing is not, by itself, information from an external law enforcement agency for the purpose of the CBDT monetary-limit exception, so a revenue appeal with tax effect below the prescribed limit is not maintainable.

---