Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority should be directed to decide the stay application within a fixed time and whether recovery proceedings should remain in abeyance until disposal of the stay application.
Analysis: The petitioner had filed an appeal along with a stay application against the assessment order, but recovery proceedings were being pursued before the stay request was considered. The order notes the continuing difficulty faced by similarly placed litigants and records that the petitioner had not opted for automatic stay in view of Section 55(4) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. In these circumstances, interim protection was considered necessary until the stay application could be adjudicated.
Conclusion: The appellate authority was directed to decide the stay application within two months, and recovery steps relating to the impugned demand were ordered to remain in abeyance until that application is disposed of.