<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 254 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396585</link>
    <description>The court directed the appellate authority to review the stay application within two months, halting revenue recovery until the stay decision. The court emphasized the need to address delays in hearing appeals and stay applications, ensuring a fair and efficient resolution for litigants. The temporary stay was ordered to facilitate concurrent consideration of the appeal and stay application, providing relief to the petitioner and promoting procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2020 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=617201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 254 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396585</link>
      <description>The court directed the appellate authority to review the stay application within two months, halting revenue recovery until the stay decision. The court emphasized the need to address delays in hearing appeals and stay applications, ensuring a fair and efficient resolution for litigants. The temporary stay was ordered to facilitate concurrent consideration of the appeal and stay application, providing relief to the petitioner and promoting procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>