Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains arising to a Cyprus resident from the transfer of shares of an Indian company were taxable in India under the applicable India-Cyprus Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and whether the Indian purchaser was required to deduct tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The applicable treaty for the assessment year was the India-Cyprus Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement then in force. Article 14(1) dealt with gains from alienation of immovable property, Article 14(2) with gains from property connected with a permanent establishment or fixed base, and Article 14(3) with ships, aircraft, and related property. The transfer in question was of shares of an Indian company by a Cyprus resident, and it did not fall within those categories. It therefore fell within Article 14(4), under which gains from the alienation of property other than that covered by paragraphs 1 to 3 are taxable only in the State of residence of the alienator.
Conclusion: The capital gains were taxable only in Cyprus and not in India, and no tax was required to be withheld in India on the remittance of the sale consideration. The challenge to the deletion of the addition failed.