TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was premature and liable to be quashed for want of material averments regarding service of statutory notice and accrual of cause of action.
Analysis: For an offence under Section 138, the complaint must disclose all essential ingredients, including presentation and dishonour of the cheque, demand notice within the prescribed time, service of notice on the drawer, and failure to pay within 15 days of receipt of the notice. A complaint filed before the cause of action arises is not maintainable. Where the complaint and the statement under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 do not disclose the date of service of notice, the statutory foundation for cognizance is incomplete. In such a situation, the proceedings cannot be sustained merely on the basis of dishonour of the cheque and dispatch of notice.
Conclusion: The complaint and the consequential criminal proceedings were held to be unsustainable and were quashed; the petitioner succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The case was disposed of by setting aside the cheque dishonour proceedings, while leaving it open to the complainant to institute a fresh complaint in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot proceed unless the complaint discloses every statutory ingredient, including service of notice and expiry of the 15-day payment period; a complaint filed before accrual of cause of action is liable to be quashed.
TaxTMI 
