Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was liable to tax short-term capital gains arising from transfer of a depreciable asset under section 50 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 at 30% instead of 20%.
Analysis: The asset had been held for more than the prescribed period and the controversy was whether the deeming provision governing depreciable assets justified taxation at the higher rate applied by the Assessing Officer. The rate issue was held to be covered by the settled legal position approved by the Supreme Court, which recognised that the gain in such circumstances is to be assessed in accordance with the applicable capital gains regime and not at the higher rate applied below.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the higher tax rate was not sustainable.