Tribunal Admits CIRP Petition, Appoints IRP, Declares Moratorium Under Section 9

The Tribunal admitted the petition for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and declared a moratorium. This decision was based on the absence of a pre-existing dispute and the acknowledgment of debt by the Corporate Debtor, meeting the criteria under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Existence of Operational Debt
2. Pre-existing Dispute
3. Admission of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)
4. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP)
5. Declaration of Moratorium

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Existence of Operational Debt:
The Petitioner, an Operational Creditor, supplied goods to the Respondent, a Corporate Debtor, and raised invoices for the same. The Corporate Debtor admitted to receiving the goods and acknowledged the debt but disputed the amount claimed. The Petitioner provided documentary evidence, including purchase orders, invoices, and email correspondence, to substantiate the existence of the operational debt.

2. Pre-existing Dispute:
The Corporate Debtor argued that there were quality issues with the goods supplied, which led to disputes over the amount payable. However, the Tribunal noted that the Corporate Debtor did not raise any pre-existing dispute in its reply to the statutory demand notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Corporate Debtor only disputed the quantum of the debt and suggested reconciliation of accounts, which does not qualify as a pre-existing dispute under the IBC.

3. Admission of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP):
The Tribunal evaluated whether the application met the criteria under Section 9 of the IBC. It concluded that the operational debt exceeded the threshold of Rs. 1 lakh, and there was no pre-existing dispute. The Corporate Debtor's acknowledgment of a lesser amount due did not negate the fact that a default had occurred. The Tribunal held that the application satisfied the requirements for admission under Section 9 of the IBC.

4. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP):
The Tribunal appointed Mr. Chillale Rajesh as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to take charge of the Corporate Debtor's management. The IRP was directed to make a public announcement and call for submissions of claims as prescribed under the IBC.

5. Declaration of Moratorium:
The Tribunal declared a moratorium effective from the date of the order until the completion of the CIRP. The moratorium prohibits the institution of suits, transferring of assets, and recovery actions against the Corporate Debtor. It also ensures the continuation of essential goods and services during the moratorium period.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal admitted the petition for initiating the CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, appointed an IRP, and declared a moratorium. The decision was based on the absence of a pre-existing dispute and the acknowledgment of debt by the Corporate Debtor, fulfilling the requirements under Section 9 of the IBC.

---