Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Department should be directed to reconsider the freezing of the assessee's bank accounts in light of the amount already recovered and the balance outstanding demand.
Analysis: The assessee's appeal was pending and 20% of the outstanding demand had already been recovered. In these circumstances, the Court found it appropriate to require the Department to decide the pending applications afresh, taking into account the amount already recovered, the balance outstanding, and the relevant CBDT circulars governing recovery measures.
Conclusion: The matter was directed to be reconsidered by the Department within a short time frame, after taking into account the recovered amount and the outstanding demand.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition did not result in an adjudication on the merits of the recovery action, but the assessee obtained a direction for timely administrative reconsideration of its request against continuation of the bank account freeze.