<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1174 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394030</link>
    <description>A writ petition concerned freezing of a co-operative society&#039;s bank accounts while its income-tax appeal remained pending and the prescribed appeal deposit had allegedly already been substantially recovered by the Department. The petitioner contended that further freezing was unnecessary in light of the amount already recovered, and sought consideration of applications placed before the appellate authority. The Department sought time to examine those applications. The Court directed the Commissioner to decide the applications within three days of receiving a certified copy of the order, taking into account the amount recovered and the remaining outstanding demand, and to act in accordance with the relevant CBDT circulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1174 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394030</link>
      <description>A writ petition concerned freezing of a co-operative society&#039;s bank accounts while its income-tax appeal remained pending and the prescribed appeal deposit had allegedly already been substantially recovered by the Department. The petitioner contended that further freezing was unnecessary in light of the amount already recovered, and sought consideration of applications placed before the appellate authority. The Department sought time to examine those applications. The Court directed the Commissioner to decide the applications within three days of receiving a certified copy of the order, taking into account the amount recovered and the remaining outstanding demand, and to act in accordance with the relevant CBDT circulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>