Chamaria Fashions' Plan Approved for V. S. Texmills Insolvency Resolution

The Adjudicating Authority approved the resolution plan submitted by Chamaria Fashions P. Ltd. for the insolvency resolution of M/s. V. S. Texmills P. Ltd., meeting the mandatory requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The plan's approval was based on the Committee of Creditors' majority voting share of 92.44%, emphasizing feasibility and compliance. The Authority highlighted the plan's conformity to statutory criteria, subject to certain observations regarding legal proceedings and waivers. Compliance with existing laws and necessary approvals were mandated, with pending interlocutory applications deemed infructuous.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Approval of the resolution plan under section 30(6) read with section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Compliance of the resolution plan with mandatory requirements under the Code and CIRP Regulations.
3. Distribution of funds as per section 53 of the Code.
4. Role and decisions of the Committee of Creditors (CoC).
5. Jurisdiction and authority of the Adjudicating Authority in approving the resolution plan.
6. Legal proceedings and waivers post-approval of the resolution plan.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Approval of the Resolution Plan:
The resolution professional (RP) filed an application seeking approval of the resolution plan dated June 20, 2019, along with its final addendum dated September 11, 2019, submitted by Chamaria Fashions P. Ltd. The plan aimed at the insolvency resolution of M/s. V. S. Texmills P. Ltd. as a going concern. The RP rectified clerical mistakes in their petition through affidavits dated December 12, 2019, and December 31, 2019.

2. Compliance with Mandatory Requirements:
The RP submitted a detailed table showing the compliance of the resolution plan with the mandatory requirements under the Code and CIRP Regulations. The table confirmed that the resolution plan met criteria such as eligibility of the resolution applicant, payment of insolvency resolution process costs, payment of debts, management of the corporate debtor, and others as specified under sections 25(2)(h), 29A, 30(1), 30(2), 30(4), 31(1), and various regulations.

3. Distribution of Funds:
The RP provided a compliance certificate in Form H, showing the liquidation value of the corporate debtor as Rs. 4,63,89,800. The resolution plan proposed the distribution of funds as per section 53(1) of the Code, prioritizing insolvency resolution process costs, secured creditors, and operational creditors among others. A detailed payment schedule for financial creditors was provided, outlining the principal and interest payments over specified quarters.

4. Role and Decisions of the CoC:
The CoC played a crucial role in the resolution process. The IRP constituted the CoC, which held multiple meetings to discuss and approve the resolution plan. The CoC approved the resolution plan with a majority voting share of 92.44%. The CoC's approval was based on the feasibility and viability of the plan, and the RP affirmed that the plan complied with the requirements of section 30 and regulation 38.

5. Jurisdiction and Authority of the Adjudicating Authority:
The Adjudicating Authority reviewed the resolution plan and confirmed that it conformed to the criteria under section 30(2) and section 31 of the Code. The Authority emphasized that its role was not to interfere with the commercial wisdom of the CoC, as affirmed by the Supreme Court in K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank. The Authority approved the resolution plan subject to certain observations, particularly regarding legal proceedings and waivers.

6. Legal Proceedings and Waivers Post-Approval:
The resolution plan included a clause regarding the automatic waiver or abatement of legal proceedings, which the Adjudicating Authority did not allow. The Authority clarified that approval of the resolution plan does not mean automatic waiver of pending legal proceedings. The resolution applicant(s) must approach competent authorities for any relief sought. The approval of the resolution plan was made subject to compliance with existing laws and obtaining necessary approvals within a specified period.

Conclusion:
The Adjudicating Authority approved the resolution plan along with the final addendum dated September 11, 2019, as it met the requirements under section 30(2) and section 31 of the Code. The approval was subject to certain observations and directions, ensuring compliance with existing laws and obtaining necessary approvals from competent authorities. Any pending interlocutory applications were disposed of as infructuous.

---