Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest on borrowings debited to the Pakistan branch was deductible in computing the assessee's income in India where the assessee carried on one business through branches in India and Pakistan.
Analysis: The assessee's head office, control, management and financial arrangements were all centralised at Calcutta, and the branches functioned under a common business organisation. On these facts, the Darsana branch was not a separate business but only a branch of one integrated business. The earlier Madras decision dealing with a distinct foreign branch was distinguished on the ground that, under the later statutory scheme, the assessee's taxable income had to be computed on the basis of the whole business carried on by it. The principle applied was that interest on capital borrowed for the purposes of an indivisible business remains an allowable deduction, even if the accounts allocate the burden branch-wise.
Conclusion: The disallowance was not justified and the assessee was entitled to deduction of the interest claimed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee carries on one integrated business through multiple branches, interest on borrowed capital used for that business is deductible in computing the taxable income as a whole, and branch-wise accounting allocation does not defeat the allowance.