Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rebate of super-tax on excess distribution of dividends can be reduced where the company has no total income chargeable to super-tax.
Analysis: Section 55 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 charges super-tax on the total income of the assessee, while Part II, Paragraph D of Schedule I of the Finance Act, 1956 merely prescribes the rate of super-tax, allows rebate and provides for reduction of that rebate in specified cases. The scheme operates only where there is a total income on which super-tax is leviable. Where the assessment results in nil income, there is no primary liability to super-tax, no rebate can arise under the first proviso, and consequently no reduction of rebate can be worked out under the second proviso. The mere fact of excess dividend distribution does not create a separate levy of super-tax.
Conclusion: The reduction of rebate of super-tax could not be made in the absence of any income chargeable to super-tax, and the answer was against the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A provision for reduction of rebate in super-tax operates only when super-tax is otherwise chargeable on total income; where total income is nil, neither rebate nor reduction of rebate can arise.