<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (3) TMI 44 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39330</link>
    <description>Super-tax rebate on excess dividend distribution could not be reduced where the assessee had no total income chargeable to super-tax. Section 55 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 imposes super-tax only on total income, while Part II, Paragraph D of Schedule I to the Finance Act, 1956 deals only with rate, rebate, and specified reduction of rebate. The scheme applies only if super-tax is otherwise leviable; where the assessment results in nil income, no primary liability to super-tax arises, so neither rebate under the first proviso nor reduction of rebate under the second proviso can operate. Excess dividend distribution does not create a separate levy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (3) TMI 44 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39330</link>
      <description>Super-tax rebate on excess dividend distribution could not be reduced where the assessee had no total income chargeable to super-tax. Section 55 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 imposes super-tax only on total income, while Part II, Paragraph D of Schedule I to the Finance Act, 1956 deals only with rate, rebate, and specified reduction of rebate. The scheme applies only if super-tax is otherwise leviable; where the assessment results in nil income, no primary liability to super-tax arises, so neither rebate under the first proviso nor reduction of rebate under the second proviso can operate. Excess dividend distribution does not create a separate levy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>