Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the applicants were entitled to protection against coercive action pending consideration of their application before the Magistrate; (ii) whether liberty should be granted to file a proper application for a reasoned order.
Issue (i): Whether the applicants were entitled to protection against coercive action pending consideration of their application before the Magistrate.
Analysis: The application was disposed of with a direction that for a limited period, or until disposal of the applicants' application, whichever was earlier, no coercive action would be taken. This granted immediate interim protection while the matter was to be considered by the court below.
Conclusion: This issue was answered in favour of the applicants.
Issue (ii): Whether liberty should be granted to file a proper application for a reasoned order.
Analysis: The applicants were permitted to move a proper application before the Magistrate, who was directed to consider all facts and circumstances and pass a reasoned order expeditiously, preferably within two months, if no other legal impediment existed.
Conclusion: This issue was answered in favour of the applicants.
Final Conclusion: The proceeding was disposed of with interim protection to the applicants and a direction for expeditious consideration of their application by the Magistrate.