Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment orders under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 could be interfered with in writ jurisdiction on the basis of an intelligence report alleging misuse of password by the tax consultant.
Analysis: The reassessment orders were founded on EFS data showing turnover for the relevant period and on the appellant's failure to produce books of account. The intelligence report related to different assessment years and was only an opinion forwarded for action; it did not constitute an adjudication of the disputed issue. The alleged misuse of password by the tax consultant was an inter se dispute and had not attained final adjudication. In these circumstances, the material relied upon by the appellant did not displace the reassessment findings, and no jurisdictional or legal error was shown in the exercise of writ powers under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
Conclusion: The challenge to the reassessment orders was rejected and the orders were upheld.