Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a registered firm, not being a company, is liable to pay tax on capital gains under section 114 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 114 applied to an assessee not being a company whose total income included income chargeable under the head capital gains. A registered firm is not a company within section 2(17) and, for assessment purposes, is treated as a separate entity distinct from its partners. The fact that partners may also be taxed on their respective shares did not justify excluding the firm from the statutory charge. The capital gain derived by the firm on sale of a capital asset held by it remained exigible to tax under the Act.
Conclusion: The registered firm was liable to pay tax on capital gains under section 114 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A registered firm, being an assessee distinct from its partners and not a company, falls within the charge of section 114 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on capital gains included in its total income.