1976 (10) TMI 33
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... R. SHARMA J.--At the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala-II, Patiala, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, has referred the following question of law to us for our opinion : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee-firm is not liable to pay tax on capital gains under section 114 of th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Reliance was also placed on sections 114 and 182 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as " the Act "), and some cases decided by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench and Bombay Bench. The Appellate Tribunal held : " However, if tax is levied on the capital gains also on a registered firm, it would amount to hardship inasmuch as the partners will have to pay again....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Act. Such a firm cannot, therefore, derive any benefit from the above-mentioned section. In K. I. Viswambharan & Brothers v. Commissioner of Income-tax [1973] 91 ITR 588 (Ker) [FB], a Full Bench of the Kerala High Court has said that for purposes of assessment to tax, the Act treats a registered firm as an entity distinct from the partners. Under the specific provisions of the Partnership Act r....
TaxTMI