Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (1) TMI 816 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal confirms income addition under Section 68 for unexplained sources. Appeal dismissed. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming the addition of Rs. 9,63,950/- as income from unexplained sources under Section 68 of the Income Tax ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal confirms income addition under Section 68 for unexplained sources. Appeal dismissed.

                            The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming the addition of Rs. 9,63,950/- as income from unexplained sources under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the transaction involving the sale of shares to be a colorable device to evade tax, as the assessee failed to provide credible evidence of the transaction's genuineness. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 17.01.2020.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Applicability of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Genuineness of the transaction related to the sale of shares.
                            3. Adequacy of evidence provided by the assessee.
                            4. Compliance with procedural requirements by the Assessing Officer (AO) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].
                            5. Allegations of the transaction being a colorable device to evade tax.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Applicability of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act:
                            The primary issue revolves around whether Section 68, which deals with unexplained cash credits, applies to the assessee who does not maintain any books of accounts. The tribunal upheld the AO's decision to invoke Section 68, emphasizing that the assessee failed to substantiate the source of Rs. 9,63,950/- claimed as long-term capital gain from the sale of shares. The tribunal noted that despite multiple opportunities, the assessee did not provide sufficient evidence to prove the transaction's genuineness.

                            2. Genuineness of the Transaction Related to the Sale of Shares:
                            The AO and CIT(A) questioned the legitimacy of the sale of 10,000 shares of M/s Supreme Agro Products Ltd. The AO found discrepancies in the dates of the contract note and the actual receipt of payment. Additionally, the Delhi Stock Exchange confirmed that no such transaction occurred on the specified date. The tribunal agreed with the lower authorities that the transaction appeared to be a paper transaction designed to evade taxes.

                            3. Adequacy of Evidence Provided by the Assessee:
                            The assessee submitted various documents, including a contract note, photocopies of cheques, and newspaper cuttings, to substantiate the claim. However, the AO and CIT(A) found these documents insufficient. The tribunal noted that M/s Supreme Agro Products Ltd. did not confirm the allotment of shares or provide necessary supporting documents such as share certificates or transfer deeds. The tribunal observed that the assessee failed to produce the broker or directors of the company to verify the transaction, further casting doubt on its authenticity.

                            4. Compliance with Procedural Requirements by the AO and CIT(A):
                            The tribunal reviewed the procedural compliance by the AO and CIT(A). The AO conducted inquiries and issued notices under Sections 131 and 133(6) to verify the transaction. The CIT(A) also issued notices and attempted to gather information from M/s Supreme Agro Products Ltd. and its directors. Despite these efforts, the required information was not furnished. The tribunal found that the authorities followed due process and provided ample opportunities to the assessee to substantiate the claim.

                            5. Allegations of the Transaction Being a Colorable Device to Evade Tax:
                            The tribunal concluded that the transaction was a colorable device intended to convert unaccounted money into long-term capital gains, which are taxed at a concessional rate. The tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. McDowell Ltd. to support this conclusion. The tribunal emphasized that the company in question was running at a loss and had not declared any dividends, making the sale price of Rs. 96.50 per share highly suspicious.

                            Conclusion:
                            The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, confirming the addition of Rs. 9,63,950/- as income from unexplained sources under Section 68. The tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide credible evidence to substantiate the transaction and that the authorities followed due process in their investigation. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 17.01.2020.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found