<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 816 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391203</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the addition of Rs. 9,63,950/- as income from unexplained sources under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the transaction involving the sale of shares to be a colorable device to evade tax, as the assessee failed to provide credible evidence of the transaction&#039;s genuineness. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 17.01.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 816 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391203</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the addition of Rs. 9,63,950/- as income from unexplained sources under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the transaction involving the sale of shares to be a colorable device to evade tax, as the assessee failed to provide credible evidence of the transaction&#039;s genuineness. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 17.01.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>