Tribunal modifies penalty order, directs 10% levy on undisclosed income. Clarification on Section 271AAB.

The Tribunal modified the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and directed the A.O. to levy the minimum penalty of 10% on the undisclosed income, partly allowing the appeal of the assessee. The judgment clarified the interpretation and application of Section 271AAB, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling all prescribed conditions to qualify for lower penalty rates.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Sustenance of penalty under Section 271AAB.
2. Applicability of clauses (a), (b), and (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 271AAB.
3. Compliance with the conditions for lower penalty rates.
4. Interpretation of "undisclosed income" under Section 271AAB.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Sustenance of Penalty under Section 271AAB:

The primary grievance of the assessee was the sustenance of a penalty amounting to Rs. 57,00,000 levied by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was based on an undisclosed income of Rs. 1.90 Crores admitted by the assessee during a search operation conducted under Section 132(1) of the Act. The A.O. observed that the assessee failed to substantiate the manner of earning the undisclosed income and levied a penalty of 30% on the undisclosed income.

2. Applicability of Clauses (a), (b), and (c) of Sub-section (1) of Section 271AAB:

The assessee contended that the conditions prescribed under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 271AAB were fulfilled, and therefore, no penalty should be exigible. However, the Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the penalty, stating that the assessee neither paid the taxes together with interest before the specified date nor filed the return declaring the undisclosed income within the stipulated time. As such, the case fell under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 271AAB, which attracts a penalty ranging from 30% to 90% of the undisclosed income.

3. Compliance with Conditions for Lower Penalty Rates:

The Ld. CIT(A) emphasized that for the application of lower penalty rates (10% or 20%), the assessee was required to fulfill all conditions, including paying taxes together with interest and filing the return declaring the undisclosed income before the specified date (31.10.2013 for A.Y. 2013-14). The assessee failed to pay the taxes before the specified date, as evidenced by the payment made on 27.03.2014. Consequently, the penalty was levied at 30% as per clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 271AAB.

4. Interpretation of "Undisclosed Income" under Section 271AAB:

The Tribunal referred to a similar case (ITA No. 697/Chd/2017) where the assessee had surrendered income during the search, which was treated as undisclosed business income. The Tribunal noted that the provisions of Section 271AAB are similar to Section 271AAA, with the difference being the rate of penalty. The Tribunal held that the surrendered income fell within the scope of "undisclosed income" as defined under Explanation (c) to Section 271AAB, and the minimum penalty of 10% was applicable if the conditions were met.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal, following its earlier decision, modified the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and directed the A.O. to levy the minimum penalty of 10% on the undisclosed income, thereby partly allowing the appeal of the assessee. The judgment clarified the interpretation and application of Section 271AAB, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling all prescribed conditions to qualify for lower penalty rates.

---