<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 287 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390674</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and directed the A.O. to levy the minimum penalty of 10% on the undisclosed income, partly allowing the appeal of the assessee. The judgment clarified the interpretation and application of Section 271AAB, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling all prescribed conditions to qualify for lower penalty rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:06:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 287 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390674</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and directed the A.O. to levy the minimum penalty of 10% on the undisclosed income, partly allowing the appeal of the assessee. The judgment clarified the interpretation and application of Section 271AAB, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling all prescribed conditions to qualify for lower penalty rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>