Treaty protection for shipping income excludes inland haulage, feeder-vessel freight and related service tax from Indian taxation.

Receipts integrally connected with shipping operations in international traffic, including inland haulage charges and feeder-vessel freight, were treated as protected shipping income under Article 9 of the India-France DTAA and were not taxable in India. Service tax collected on inland haulage charges was also excluded from gross receipts for section 44B computation because the underlying income was treaty-protected. The Indian agent was not regarded as an agency permanent establishment, as it was remunerated at arm's length and the PE objection was academic in light of the treaty exemption. Related tax-computation and credit issues were left for rectification, and the penalty ground was rejected as premature.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether inland haulage charges formed part of income from operation of ships in international traffic and were taxable in India; (ii) whether service tax collected on inland haulage charges could be included in gross receipts for computation under section 44B; (iii) whether freight from transportation of cargo through feeder vessels was taxable in India or covered by the treaty; (iv) whether the Indian agent constituted an agency permanent establishment of the assessee.

Issue (i): Whether inland haulage charges formed part of income from operation of ships in international traffic and were taxable in India.

Analysis: The receipt from inland haulage charges was held to be integrally connected with the shipping business and to form part of income from operation of ships in international traffic. The same treaty provision had been construed in earlier years in the assessee's own case, and the identical issue was followed in the present year.

Conclusion: Inland haulage charges were held to be covered by Article 9 of the India-France Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement and were not taxable in India.

Issue (ii): Whether service tax collected on inland haulage charges could be included in gross receipts for computation under section 44B.

Analysis: Once the underlying inland haulage charges were treated as treaty-protected shipping income, the question of assessing the same under section 44B did not arise. The service tax component was therefore not to be treated as part of gross receipts for tax computation, following the earlier view taken in the assessee's own case.

Conclusion: Service tax collected on inland haulage charges was held not to form part of gross receipts for computation of income.

Issue (iii): Whether freight from transportation of cargo through feeder vessels was taxable in India or covered by the treaty.

Analysis: Freight from feeder-vessel operations was treated as part of shipping income in international traffic. The issue was held to be governed by the same treaty protection as the assessee's shipping receipts, and the earlier binding view in the assessee's own case was followed.

Conclusion: Freight from transportation of cargo through feeder vessels was held to be covered by Article 9(1) of the India-France Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement and not taxable in India.

Issue (iv): Whether the Indian agent constituted an agency permanent establishment of the assessee.

Analysis: The existence of an agency permanent establishment was held to be academic once the relevant receipts were treated as treaty-exempt shipping income. Independently, the Indian agent was remunerated at arm's length, and on that basis it could not be treated as an agency permanent establishment.

Conclusion: The Indian agent was held not to constitute an agency permanent establishment of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The substantive additions relating to inland haulage charges, service tax on those charges, and feeder-vessel freight were deleted, while the objection on agency permanent establishment also failed. The remaining grievance relating to tax computation and credit issues was directed to be verified in rectification proceedings, and the penalty ground was rejected as premature.

Ratio Decidendi: Receipts integrally connected with shipping operations in international traffic are protected by the treaty as shipping income, and an Indian agent remunerated at arm's length does not constitute an agency permanent establishment.

---