Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (12) TMI 79 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal grants Rs. 1 crore deduction under Section 54EC for investments, overturning lower authorities The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, permitting a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC for investments made in two different financial ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal grants Rs. 1 crore deduction under Section 54EC for investments, overturning lower authorities

                            The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, permitting a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC for investments made in two different financial years, contrary to the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) interpretation limiting the investment to Rs. 50 lakhs per financial year. The Tribunal held that the legislative intent and precedents supported the assessee's position, allowing the benefit of Rs. 1 crore when investments were made within six months of the transfer of the original asset, even if spread over two financial years. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction as claimed by the assessee.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether the assessee is entitled to a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for investments made in two different financial years.
                            2. Interpretation of the proviso to Section 54EC regarding the limit of Rs. 50 lakhs on investments in specified bonds within a financial year.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Deduction under Section 54EC for Investments in Two Different Financial Years:
                            The appellant filed a return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 1,51,77,310/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and it was observed that the assessee sold a property resulting in a long-term capital gain of Rs. 1,93,16,309/-. The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC by investing Rs. 50 lakhs in REC Bonds in January 2013 and another Rs. 50 lakhs in April 2013. The Assessing Officer (AO) restricted the exemption to Rs. 50 lakhs, interpreting that the law limits the investment under Section 54EC to Rs. 50 lakhs per financial year. The AO argued that allowing Rs. 1 crore would lead to discrimination among taxpayers, as it would favor those who sell property between October and March over those who sell between April and September. The AO's decision was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], who emphasized that the intention of the legislature was to restrict the exemption to Rs. 50 lakhs per financial year to ensure equitable distribution among small investors.

                            2. Interpretation of the Proviso to Section 54EC:
                            The CIT(A) reiterated that the proviso to Section 54EC(1) clearly limits the investment in specified bonds to Rs. 50 lakhs per financial year. The CIT(A) argued that interpreting the provision to allow Rs. 1 crore by spreading the investment over two financial years would vitiate the original intent of the legislature and lead to unequal treatment of taxpayers. The CIT(A) also referenced the explanatory notes of the Finance Act 2007, which aimed to impose a ceiling on the quantum of investment to ensure equitable distribution of benefits among prospective investors.

                            Tribunal's Decision:
                            The Tribunal considered the arguments and cited several cases where similar issues were decided in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of Rs. 1 crore by investing Rs. 50 lakhs in two different financial years. Significant cases referenced include:
                            - ACIT Vs. Akshay Sobti (2019) 106 taxmann.com 60 (Del-Trib.)
                            - Tulika Devi Dayal Vs. JCIT (2018) 89 taxmann.com 442 (Mum. –trib)
                            - ACIT Vs. Shri Ajay Kaila (ITA No. 6907/Del/2015)

                            The Tribunal noted that the proviso to Section 54EC, as it stood before the amendment effective from 01.04.2015, did not restrict the total investment to Rs. 50 lakhs but rather limited the investment per financial year to Rs. 50 lakhs. The Tribunal found that the assessee's interpretation was consistent with the legislative intent and judicial precedents, which allowed the benefit of Rs. 1 crore when investments were made in two different financial years within six months of the transfer of the original asset.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s decision and directed the AO to allow the deduction under Section 54EC for Rs. 1 crore as claimed by the assessee. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, affirming that investments made within six months from the transfer of the original asset, even if spread over two financial years, are entitled to the deduction under Section 54EC up to Rs. 1 crore.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found