Tribunal rules on cost of acquisition in tax case, no capital gain assessed

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision in a tax case, ruling that the cost of acquisition for a 41,257 sq. ft. area should be the market value on the date of receipt, resulting in no capital gain. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the computation of capital gains for a 35,495 sq. ft. area based on the market value as of a specific date. The decision aligns with the Supreme Court's precedent that if the cost of acquisition cannot be ascertained, the computation provisions are invalid, leading to no capital gain assessment.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition made by AO amounting to Rs. 17,22,43,975/- by considering the cost of acquisition by the assessee at nil.
2. Determination of cost of acquisition for 41,257 sq. ft. area.
3. Determination of cost of acquisition for 35,495 sq. ft. area and computation of capital gains.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition Made by AO (Rs. 17,22,43,975/-):
The Revenue's primary contention is against the CIT(A)’s order deleting the addition of Rs. 17,22,43,975/- by considering the cost of acquisition at market value, arguing that the assessee did not incur any cost in acquiring the constructed area of 41,257 sq. ft. from M/s Keshav and Co. The AO assessed this amount as a short-term capital gain, considering the cost of acquisition as nil. The CIT(A), however, held that the cost of acquisition should be taken as the market value on the date of receipt (30.04.2005), which was Rs. 17,22,47,975/-, resulting in no capital gain. The CIT(A) relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty, which states that if the cost of acquisition cannot be determined, the computation provisions fail, and hence, no capital gain can be assessed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, confirming that the cost of acquisition should be the market value as on 30.04.2005.

2. Determination of Cost of Acquisition for 41,257 sq. ft. Area:
The AO argued that the cost of acquisition should be nil, as the assessee did not incur any cost for acquiring the constructed area. However, the CIT(A) determined that the cost of acquisition should be the market value as on 30.04.2005, based on the retirement deed, which entitled the assessee to receive the property. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that the market value on the date of receipt should be considered as the cost of acquisition, resulting in no capital gain. The Tribunal also noted that if the cost of acquisition is not determinable, the computation provision fails, as per the Supreme Court’s ruling in B.C. Srinivasa Setty.

3. Determination of Cost of Acquisition for 35,495 sq. ft. Area and Computation of Capital Gains:
For the subsequent year, the Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)’s order considering the cost of acquisition for 35,495 sq. ft. at market value. The AO had computed the entire sale consideration as capital gain, adopting the cost of acquisition as nil. The CIT(A) determined the cost of acquisition based on the market value as on 30.04.2005, which was Rs. 4,175 per sq. ft., resulting in a capital gain of Rs. 5,78,55,606/-. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, confirming that the cost of acquisition should be the market value as on 30.04.2005, consistent with the earlier year’s decision. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)’s order.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the CIT(A)'s orders that the cost of acquisition should be the market value as on the date of receipt, resulting in no capital gain for the 41,257 sq. ft. area and confirming the computation of capital gain for the 35,495 sq. ft. area based on the market value as on 30.04.2005. The Tribunal's decision was consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling in B.C. Srinivasa Setty, emphasizing that if the cost of acquisition cannot be determined, the computation provisions fail.

---