<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a tax case, ruling that the cost of acquisition for a 41,257 sq. ft. area should be the market value on the date of receipt, resulting in no capital gain. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the computation of capital gains for a 35,495 sq. ft. area based on the market value as of a specific date. The decision aligns with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent that if the cost of acquisition cannot be ascertained, the computation provisions are invalid, leading to no capital gain assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 08:18:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a tax case, ruling that the cost of acquisition for a 41,257 sq. ft. area should be the market value on the date of receipt, resulting in no capital gain. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the computation of capital gains for a 35,495 sq. ft. area based on the market value as of a specific date. The decision aligns with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent that if the cost of acquisition cannot be ascertained, the computation provisions are invalid, leading to no capital gain assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>