Tribunal Upholds Ruling on Royalty Payments as Revenue Expenditure

The Tribunal confirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s decision to delete the disallowance of royalty payments, considering previous consistent rulings in the assessee's favor for earlier assessment years. The Tribunal held that the payments were for the right to use a logo, qualifying as revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure. As a result, the Revenue's appeals were dismissed, affirming the findings of the CIT(A).

---

---

Issues involved:
- Appeal by Revenue against deletion of disallowance of royalty payments by CIT(A)
- Challenge of Tribunal's decision by Revenue
- Consideration of Tribunal's decision in assessee's own case for earlier assessment years

Analysis:
1. The judgment involves appeals filed by the Revenue against the deletion of disallowance of royalty payments by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in the cases of two different entities for the assessment year 2016-17. The appeals were disposed of together as the issues were identical in both cases.

2. The main issue raised by the Revenue in both appeals was against the action of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of "Royalty Payments" based on a decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case. The Revenue contended that despite the Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessees, the Revenue had challenged the decisions, and therefore, the CIT(A)'s orders should be reversed.

3. The Revenue argued that the royalty payments should be treated as capital expenditure, and depreciation should be allowed. However, the assessee's representative highlighted that the payments were for the right to use a logo, not for purchasing the logo itself, and thus should be considered as revenue expenditure.

4. The Tribunal examined the previous decision in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2012-13, where a similar issue regarding royalty payments was considered. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the payments were for the right to use the logo and should be allowed as revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure.

5. Considering the consistent decisions of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case for earlier assessment years and following the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench, the Tribunal confirmed the findings of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of royalty payments. Consequently, both appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.

6. The judgment was pronounced on 22nd October 2019 in Chennai, with Shri George Mathan and Shri Ramit Kochar presiding over the case. The representatives for the parties were Mr. J. Pavithran Kumar for the Revenue and Mr. S. Gautam for the Assessee.

---