Tribunal deletes Rs. 43,70,000 addition after finding assessee's explanation satisfactory.

The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 43,70,000. The tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the source of the cash deposits to be satisfactory, emphasizing the close family relationship, the availability of funds from a known source, the supporting affidavit, and the consistent actions taken in good faith. The addition was deemed to be based on mere suspicions without concrete evidence, leading to its deletion.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the addition of Rs. 43,70,000/- on account of unexplained cash deposits in the assessee's bank account.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Validity of the Addition of Rs. 43,70,000/- on Account of Unexplained Cash Deposits

Background and Arguments:

The primary issue contested in this appeal was the addition of Rs. 43,70,000/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of unexplained cash deposits in the assessee's bank account. The assessee argued that the source of these deposits was a close family friend, Shri Jarnail Singh, who had provided the funds for investment purposes. The assessee claimed that Shri Jarnail Singh had withdrawn Rs. 75,00,000/- from his bank account after receiving compensation for acquired agricultural land and had given Rs. 43,70,000/- to the assessee for investment in the share market and Rs. 31,00,000/- for a life insurance policy.

Evidence and Findings:

1. Source of Funds:
- The assessee provided evidence of Shri Jarnail Singh's bank account showing a withdrawal of Rs. 75,00,000/- on 12.10.2009.
- The Rs. 31,00,000/- used for the life insurance policy in Shri Jarnail Singh’s name was accepted by the AO, confirming the close relationship and trust between the parties.

2. Investment and Loss:
- The assessee invested Rs. 43,70,000/- in his India Bulls Securities account, which resulted in a significant loss.
- The AO and CIT(A) questioned why the investment was not made in Shri Jarnail Singh's name and doubted the genuineness of the transaction due to the lack of documentary evidence directly linking the funds to Shri Jarnail Singh.

3. Affidavit and Supporting Evidence:
- The assessee submitted an affidavit from Shri Jarnail Singh’s daughter, Ms. Tejinder Kaur, confirming the funds were given to the assessee for investment purposes.
- The affidavit stated that the funds were given due to the close family relationship and the trust placed in the assessee by Shri Jarnail Singh.
- The tax authorities did not attempt to rebut or examine the contents of the affidavit, which was dated before the issuance of the notice by the AO.

Tribunal’s Decision:

The tribunal found that the assessee had satisfactorily explained the source of the cash deposits. The following points were crucial in the decision:

- Close Family Relationship: The close family relationship between the assessee’s father and Shri Jarnail Singh was well established and not disputed by the Revenue.
- Availability of Funds: The source of funds with Shri Jarnail Singh was clear and undisputed, as evidenced by the withdrawal from his bank account following the compensation for acquired land.
- Affidavit: The affidavit from Ms. Tejinder Kaur was a significant piece of evidence supporting the assessee’s claim. The Revenue failed to challenge or disprove the affidavit’s contents.
- Good Faith Actions: The assessee’s actions, including the investment in the insurance policy and the share market, were consistent with the instructions from Shri Jarnail Singh, demonstrating good faith and trust.

The tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 43,70,000/- was based on mere suspicions and not on concrete evidence. Therefore, the addition was directed to be deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.

Order Pronouncement:

The order was pronounced in the Open Court on 26th September 2019, allowing the appeal of the assessee and directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 43,70,000/-.

---