Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on account of outstanding trade creditors was sustainable when the liability had not been written back in the assessee's books and the winding-up process had not been completed.
Analysis: The liability was shown as outstanding in the balance sheet, and the assessee had not unilaterally written it back to the profit and loss account. The assessee was a sick industrial unit, the winding-up process was not complete, and the matter was sub judice before the appellate authority for industrial and financial reconstruction. On these facts, the liability could not be treated as having ceased to exist. The principle applied was that section 41(1) is attracted only where there is remission or cessation of liability, which was not established here.
Conclusion: The addition under section 41(1) was rightly deleted, and the Revenue's challenge failed.