Tribunal affirms separate windmill deduction under Section 80IA(4)

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80IA(4) on an undertaking-wise basis, treating each windmill as a separate undertaking for computing deductions. The Tribunal's ruling aligned with statutory language and previous decisions, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and confirming relief for the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deduction under Section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
2. Treatment of windmills as separate undertakings for the purpose of deduction
3. Methodology of computing deduction under Section 80IA(4)

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deduction under Section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The primary issue revolves around the deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, engaged in the business of tobacco and power generation from windmills, claimed a deduction of Rs. 17,69,56,668/- under this section. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied the deduction, stating that the assessee had a cumulative loss of Rs. 142,13,14,341/- on a consolidated basis and thus was not eligible for the deduction. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], however, granted relief to the assessee by treating each windmill as a separate undertaking, following the precedent set in the assessee's own case for previous assessment years.

2. Treatment of windmills as separate undertakings for the purpose of deduction:
The CIT(A) and the Tribunal had to decide whether each windmill set up at different locations and in different years should be treated as separate undertakings for the purpose of Section 80IA deduction. The AO's stance was that the windmills should be treated as a single business undertaking, thereby consolidating profits and losses. However, the CIT(A) and the Tribunal sided with the assessee, referencing the Pune ITAT's decision in the case of M/s. J-Sons Foundry Pvt. Ltd., which held that each windmill constitutes a separate undertaking. This interpretation aligns with the statutory language of Section 80IA, which refers to "undertaking" or "enterprise" rather than the business as a whole.

3. Methodology of computing deduction under Section 80IA(4):
The AO argued that the deduction should be computed on a consolidated basis for all windmills. In contrast, the CIT(A) and the Tribunal upheld the view that the deduction should be computed independently for each windmill. This approach was supported by the Tribunal's previous decisions and the CIT(A)'s interpretation, which emphasized that each windmill's financial results should be considered separately. The Tribunal reiterated that the "business" in Section 80IA(5) should be understood as the business of each "undertaking" or "enterprise."

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80IA(4) on an undertaking-wise basis rather than a consolidated basis. The Tribunal's decision was consistent with its previous rulings in the assessee's own case and similar cases, thereby providing a clear interpretation of Section 80IA that supports treating each windmill as a separate undertaking for the purpose of computing deductions. The appeal of the Revenue was thus dismissed, and the order pronounced on 1st August 2019 confirmed the CIT(A)'s relief granted to the assessee.

---