Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the CBDT circular enhancing the monetary limits for departmental appeals applied to pending appeals and, if so, whether the Revenue appeals below the threshold were liable to be withdrawn as not maintainable.
Analysis: The circular dated 8 August 2019 was read as an amendment to Circular No. 3 of 2018 and not as a standalone instruction. The unchanged portion of the earlier circular continued to provide that the enhanced monetary limits would apply retrospectively to pending appeals as well as to appeals to be filed in future. The modification was therefore held to govern pending departmental appeals, and the tax effect threshold barred further prosecution of appeals falling below the prescribed limit.
Conclusion: The enhancement of monetary limits applied to pending departmental appeals, and the Revenue appeals below the threshold were treated as withdrawn.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge did not survive because the appeals were covered by the CBDT litigation policy governing low tax effect matters.
Ratio Decidendi: A CBDT circular enhancing monetary limits for departmental appeals, when issued as a modification to an existing circular that expressly applies retrospectively, governs pending as well as future appeals falling below the prescribed threshold.