Tribunal Upholds CIT(A)'s Decisions on Disallowances and Expenses

The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue's and the assessee's appeals, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on various issues including disallowance of chilling charges, addition of share application money, depreciation on Tetra Pack machine, and repair and maintenance expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the need for verifiable evidence and adherence to prescribed monetary limits for filing appeals. The order was pronounced on 3rd September 2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Disallowance of Rs. 31,05,390/- on account of chilling charges.
2. Addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- under section 68 on account of share application money.
3. Disallowance of Rs. 38,00,000/- on account of chilling charges for AY 2006-07.
4. Disallowance of Rs. 1,02,232/- for depreciation on Tetra Pack machine.
5. Disallowance of Rs. 2,50,000/- on account of repair and maintenance expenses.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Rs. 31,05,390/- on account of chilling charges:

The Revenue's appeal against the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 31,05,390/- made on chilling charges was dismissed. The Tribunal noted that the tax effect involved was below the prescribed monetary limit of Rs. 50 Lakhs for filing appeals before the ITAT, as per CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019. The Tribunal confirmed that the circular applied to pending appeals, referencing the Ahmedabad Bench's decision and a CBDT letter dated 20th August 2019, which clarified the circular's applicability to all pending appeals. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as infructuous with liberty to file for recall if covered by exceptions in Circular No. 3/2018 as amended on 20/08/2018.

2. Addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- under section 68 on account of share application money:

The Revenue's appeal also included the deletion of an addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- made by the AO under section 68 due to unverified share application money. However, as the tax effect was below the prescribed limit, the appeal was dismissed for the same reasons as the chilling charges disallowance.

3. Disallowance of Rs. 38,00,000/- on account of chilling charges for AY 2006-07:

The assessee's appeal against the disallowance of Rs. 38,00,000/- for chilling charges was dismissed. The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to provide evidence to justify the increase in chilling charges from the previous year. The assessee's explanation of increased milk quantity and varying chilling rates due to multiple factors was not substantiated with evidence. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s finding that the chilling expenses were not incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, noting the significant cash payments and self-generated vouchers as unjustified.

4. Disallowance of Rs. 1,02,232/- for depreciation on Tetra Pack machine:

The assessee's appeal against the disallowance of Rs. 1,02,232/- for depreciation on a Tetra Pack machine was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting the lack of evidence to prove the machine was put to use before 30th September 2005. The assessee's inability to provide such evidence led to the conclusion that the machine was used for less than 180 days, justifying only half the allowable depreciation.

5. Disallowance of Rs. 2,50,000/- on account of repair and maintenance expenses:

The assessee's appeal against the disallowance of Rs. 2,50,000/- for repair and maintenance expenses was dismissed. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that the disallowance was justified due to unverifiable self-made vouchers. The CIT(A) noted that the disallowance was a small percentage (about 1%) of the total claimed expenses, making it reasonable in the absence of verifiable third-party bills.

Summary:

Both the appeals of the Revenue and the assessee were dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings on all issues, emphasizing the importance of verifiable evidence and adherence to prescribed monetary limits for appeals. The order was pronounced in the open court on 3rd September 2019.

---