Tax Appeals Dismissed; Deductions for Wind Power Profits and Education Cess Approved Under Income Tax Act.

The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals for the relevant assessment years, citing the CBDT circular's monetary limits. The assessee's cross appeal and objections were upheld, granting deductions under Section 80IA(4) for profits from wind power generation and allowing education cess as an expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition on account of guarantee commission fees.
2. Deletion of disallowance made under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
3. Deletion of disallowance out of colliery and repairs and maintenance expenses.
4. Eligibility for deduction under Section 80IA(4) for the profits derived from power generation through Wind Mill units.
5. Deductibility of education cess paid as an expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition on Account of Guarantee Commission Fees:
The Revenue's appeals for Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15 included the issue of whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] was justified in deleting the additions made on account of guarantee commission fees for computing arm’s length price for the corporate guarantee given by the appellant on behalf of the Associated Enterprise (AE). The tribunal dismissed these appeals as non-maintainable based on the CBDT circular No.3/2018 and subsequent amendment dated 8th August 2019, which prescribes a monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs for filing appeals.

2. Deletion of Disallowance Made Under Section 14A:
The appeals also questioned the deletion of disallowances made under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act for various assessment years. These disallowances were also dismissed by the tribunal citing the same CBDT circular, as the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary limit.

3. Deletion of Disallowance Out of Colliery and Repairs and Maintenance Expenses:
The Revenue challenged the deletion of disallowances out of colliery and repairs and maintenance expenses. The tribunal dismissed these appeals as non-maintainable due to the tax effect being below the monetary limit specified in the CBDT circular.

4. Eligibility for Deduction Under Section 80IA(4):
The assessee's cross appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13 involved the issue of whether the CIT(A) erred in not allowing the claim of deduction under Section 80IA(4) for profits derived from the eligible power generation business through Wind Mill units. The tribunal analyzed three sub-issues:
- Whether the claim made during assessment proceedings without a revised return can be entertained.
- Whether the absence of an audit report in Form 10CCB along with the return invalidates the claim.
- Whether the deduction should be allowed for each unit individually or after consolidating profits and losses of all eligible units.

The tribunal concluded that:
- The Assessing Officer (AO) is duty-bound to compute the correct income even if the claim was not made in the original return but during assessment proceedings.
- The audit report in Form 10CCB can be submitted during assessment proceedings.
- Deduction under Section 80IA(4) should be provided for each eligible unit individually, not on a consolidated basis.

5. Deductibility of Education Cess as an Expenditure Under Section 37:
The cross objections raised by the assessee for Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15, and additional grounds for Assessment Year 2012-13, involved whether the education cess paid should be allowed as an expenditure under Section 37. The tribunal referred to the judgment of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Chambal Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited, which held that education cess is not a tax and is thus deductible as an expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of education cess.

Conclusion:
The tribunal dismissed all the appeals filed by the Revenue for the assessment years in question due to the tax effect being below the monetary limits specified in the CBDT circular. The assessee's cross appeal and cross objections were allowed, granting the deduction under Section 80IA(4) for the profits from the eligible power generation business and allowing the deduction of education cess as an expenditure under Section 37.

---