Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether assessment orders passed under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 could be sustained when they did not deal with the assessee's submissions and were therefore alleged to be non-speaking and contrary to natural justice.
Analysis: The impugned orders recorded the assessee's stand that it was only providing an online marketplace and was not carrying on the business of buying and selling goods, but they did not give reasons for rejecting that stand. The orders also did not consider the reliance placed on the statutory exemption under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The absence of reasons meant that the decision-making process was flawed, and relegating the assessee to an appeal would not cure the defect because neither the assessee nor the appellate authority would know why the submissions were rejected. An original authority must deal with the parties' submissions and support its conclusion with reasons, particularly when the submissions are not accepted.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration and disposal in accordance with law after following the principles of natural justice.