Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revised assessment order was liable to be set aside for denial of personal hearing before finalisation of the assessment.
Analysis: The petitioner had sought personal hearing at an early stage, there was a substantial lapse of time between the revisional notice, the reply and the subsequent requisition for purchase bills, and the impugned order was passed after the bills had been produced without affording an opportunity to explain them. In these peculiar facts, the denial of hearing was treated as a sufficient ground to interfere, while leaving the merits of the assessment unanswered.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside for denial of personal hearing, and the matter was directed to be heard afresh and re-assessed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxpayer has specifically sought personal hearing and the assessment is completed after a significant lapse of time without giving that opportunity, the order is liable to be interfered with on the ground of breach of natural justice.