<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 893 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383197</link>
    <description>A revised assessment order was interfered with because the taxpayer had specifically sought personal hearing, yet the assessment was finalised after a substantial lapse of time without affording an opportunity to explain the purchase bills produced in response to the requisition. The assessment was set aside on breach of natural justice, and the matter was sent back for fresh hearing and reassessment. The merits of the assessment were left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:41:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 893 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383197</link>
      <description>A revised assessment order was interfered with because the taxpayer had specifically sought personal hearing, yet the assessment was finalised after a substantial lapse of time without affording an opportunity to explain the purchase bills produced in response to the requisition. The assessment was set aside on breach of natural justice, and the matter was sent back for fresh hearing and reassessment. The merits of the assessment were left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>