Revenue's Appeal Partially Upheld: Section 68 Credits Allowed, Income from Other Sources Remanded

The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 1,80,00,000 under Section 68 of the IT Act for unproved credits related to share capital and premium. The Tribunal remanded the issue of Rs. 6,14,000 added as income from other sources back to the CIT(A) for proper adjudication following procedural requirements. The order was issued on 10th June 2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 1,80,00,000 under Section 68 of the IT Act on account of unproved credits.
2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 6,14,000 made by the AO as income from other sources.
3. Whether the assessee submitted all books of account before the Assessing Officer.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 1,80,00,000 under Section 68:
The Revenue challenged the deletion of Rs. 1,80,00,000 added by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 68 of the IT Act, which pertains to unproved credits in the form of share application money/share capital and share premium. The AO made this addition due to the assessee's failure to provide necessary details such as identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the share subscribers, despite multiple notices and opportunities. The AO observed that the share capital and premium were received in cash from eight parties, who had negligible income and common directors, and the transactions were not supported by bank statements. Local enquiries revealed no business activity at the addresses of the subscriber companies, and they were found to be controlled by an individual engaged in providing accommodation entries.

The CIT(A) deleted the addition, relying on the assessee's submission of books of account and other documents, and the principle that once primary evidence is submitted, the onus shifts to the AO to prove otherwise. The CIT(A) held that the assessee had discharged its onus under Section 68. However, the Tribunal, relying on various judicial precedents including the Supreme Court's decision in NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd., found that the assessee failed to establish the creditworthiness of the subscribers and the genuineness of the transactions. Consequently, the Tribunal restored the AO's addition of Rs. 1,80,00,000 under Section 68.

2. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 6,14,000 as Income from Other Sources:
The Revenue also challenged the deletion of Rs. 6,14,000 added by the AO as income from other sources due to the assessee's failure to produce books of account and vouchers. The CIT(A) admitted additional evidence in the form of books of account and vouchers and deleted the addition after examining them. However, the Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) failed to follow the procedure under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, which requires providing the AO an opportunity to examine the additional evidence. Therefore, the Tribunal restored this issue to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication following the due process of law.

3. Submission of Books of Account:
The AO contended that the assessee did not submit all books of account during the assessment proceedings. The CIT(A), however, accepted the books of account and vouchers produced during the appellate proceedings and deleted the additions based on this evidence. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not adhere to Rule 46A, which mandates giving the AO a chance to examine any new evidence. As a result, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration with proper adherence to procedural requirements.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Revenue partly for statistical purposes, sustaining the addition of Rs. 1,80,00,000 under Section 68 and remanding the issue of Rs. 6,14,000 for fresh adjudication by the CIT(A) following the due process of law. The order was pronounced in the open court on 10th June 2019.

---